Why the Golden State Warriors would still beat the 95-96 Bulls

Pace and versatility

In 2015, Michael Jordan said the game has changed for the better. He cited that the emphasis on versatility makes it much more challenging. He reasoned that the ability to play four positions is incredibly valuable and an improvement to the singular dominance of yesteryear.

The Warriors thrive on versatility. They have a 6’6 player who was drafted as a small forward, but thrives as one of the best rim-protecting centers in the NBA. He’s a better version of Dennis Rodman, who didn’t know what to do with the ball in his hands on offense in Chicago.

The ’95-96 Bulls were 20th in pace (91.1). The ’15-16 Warriors were second (99.3). The Warriors would dominate an open floor game. Of guys that played at least 75 games, only Toni Kukoc was under the age of 30. For the Warriors, only Shaun Livingston was at least 30.

Despite being amazing athletes, chasing Curry, Thompson, and Draymond Green around wears down even the youngest and freshest bodies. Now a team that isn’t accustomed to that pace? It’s hard to imagine a 35 year old Rodman staying with Green for 40+ minutes.

Chicago’s big three were definitely versatile enough to defend multiple positions. But outside of that, they don’t quite compare to Golden State, whose backup point guard is 6’7. But the switch-heavy defense and up-tempo play would wear down the Bulls over the course of 48 minutes.

Next: Hand check, please